Vai al contenuto principale

Cookie settings

We use cookies to ensure the basic functionalities of the website and to enhance your online experience. You can configure and accept the use of the cookies, and modify your consent options, at any time.

Essential

Preferences

Analytics and statistics

Marketing

Youth power! - ¡Transforma la política con participación digital, artes y teatro legislativo!

Modifiche a "Basta de la cuerda floja: Fin al tokenismo, financiación con continuidad"

Avatar: olivier Schulbaum olivier Schulbaum

Corpo del testo (English)

  • -
  • -
    The Issue / El problema:
  • -
    Youth participation in mental health policymaking is often symbolic. Processes like Mindset Revolution invite young people to lead and share their experiences but can't guarantee a structure for long-term dialogue, follow-up, or institutional change. Researchers and activists collect stories and ploicy recomendations, public managers promise implementation, but when pressure from above kicks in, the system defaults to tokenism. Each actor deflects responsibility downward, leaving young people in precarity — again.
  • -
    Where was the issue identified? / ¿Dónde se identificó el problema?
  • -
    on
  • -
    Story or Inspiration /  Historia o Inspiración
  • -
    In the play, Zainab balances on the rope representing every youth who’s asked to “have a voice” without power. In front of her, Sonia, a researcher holds data, yet can’t intervene. Next, a policymaker avoids eye contact when asked about implementation. Then Lee, the senior manager, blocks action with institutional excuses. And finally, the GMCA Executive stands with scissors in one hand and a credit card in the other — the power to fund or to cut. None step off the line. The scene ends not in collapse, but with a demand: build a net — a participatory structure that carries the weight together.
  • -
    Targeted Policy Area: Who Should Act? / ¿Quién debería actuar?
  • -
    Greater Manchester Combined Authority (GMCA) Department for Health and Social Care (UK) HM Treasury (funding conditions for participatory projects) Local Authorities and Participation Units Universities with research funding linked to civic engagement
  • -
    Legislative Change / Cambio legislativo Esperado
  • +
  • +
    The Issue / El problema:
  • +
    Youth participation in mental health policymaking is often symbolic. Processes like Mindset Revolution invite young people to lead and share their experiences but can't guarantee a structure for long-term dialogue, follow-up, or institutional change. Researchers and activists collect stories and ploicy recomendations, public managers promise implementation, but when pressure from above kicks in, the system defaults to tokenism. Each actor deflects responsibility downward, leaving young people in precarity — again.
  • +
    Where was the issue identified? / ¿Dónde se identificó el problema?
  • +
    on
  • +
    Story or Inspiration /  Historia o Inspiración
  • +
    In the play, Zainab balances on the rope representing every youth who’s asked to “have a voice” without power. In front of her, Sonia, a researcher holds data, yet can’t intervene. Next, a policymaker avoids eye contact when asked about implementation. Then Lee, the senior manager, blocks action with institutional excuses. And finally, the GMCA Executive stands with scissors in one hand and a credit card in the other — the power to fund or to cut. None step off the line. The scene ends not in collapse, but with a demand: build a net — a participatory structure that carries the weight together.
  • +
    Targeted Policy Area: Who Should Act? / ¿Quién debería actuar?
  • +
    Greater Manchester Combined Authority (GMCA) Department for Health and Social Care (UK) HM Treasury (funding conditions for participatory projects) Local Authorities and Participation Units Universities with research funding linked to civic engagement
  • +
    Legislative Change / Cambio legislativo Esperado
  • Participatory Continuity Council (formal, funded structure at GMCA level) with power to:
  • - Track the chain of responsibility in all participatory processes related to mental health
  • - Require mid-term implementation reporting from policy units
  • - Host co-accountability hearings twice a year involving youth, researchers, and institutional reps
  • Mandatory inclusion of follow-up protocols in all publicly funded participatory projects involving vulnerable or high-risk populations (including care funding and training)
  • -Ring-fenced budget for care infrastructure and youth facilitation in participatory policymaking
  • +Ring-fenced budget for care infrastructure and youth facilitation in participatory policymaking
  • Conferma

    Please log in

    La password è troppo breve.

    Condividi